CD GNR facebook (HOT) www.facebook.com/gunsnroses.usCD GNR twitter www.twitter.com/gunsnrosesCD Update us live!
Kurt Cobain Probably loved the fuck outta Guns n Roses and Axl probably did the same for nirvana. But the fat, Cigar-Smoking, Suit wearing Faggots who work and own Geffen decide that neither bands should like each other and so Create a Commercial Rivalry so then Geffen gets more money, and has Worked Brilliantly in the Past ( Beatles vs Rolling Stones, Blur vs Oasis).And anyone one can put a price on Courtney Love to Fuck something up wether its a band or an award show.But I Think both bands were very simalar, in the way Guns n Roses had their agressive songs (YCBM,WTTJ) And so did Nirvana ( Breed, Terratorial Pissings, Radio Freindly Unit Shifter).And both had their slow songs, Guns had their ballads ( Patience, November Rain) and Nirvana had their thought-provoking Songs ( Dumb, Polly, All Apoligies).
Dont take this the wrong way Karin but your friends look like they are wild in bed, I mean pure filthy.
the rolling stones are NOT overratedwait, you ment the beatles were overrated didnt you
Jesus, can people please stop with the "My opinion on music is better than everyone else's" attitude. I mean The Spaghetti Incident?, why bother saying the Rolling Stones were better than the Beatles in such an arrogant manner? I mean it's quite hard to compare them really. The Stones were always very riff based and very bluesy. The Beatles on the other hand had no real formula for songs. Some songs, the most commonly know ones, are very poppy and I don't personally like them much. But others were very abstract, some were bluesy etc. I mean have you even heard The White Album?Now I'm not a huge fan of either band, but you don't have to make arrogant and uneducated comments like that.
Jesus, can people please stop with the "My opinion on music is better than everyone else's" attitude. I mean The Spaghetti Incident?, why bother saying the Rolling Stones were better than the Beatles in such an arrogant manner? I mean it's quite hard to compare them really. The Stones were always very riff based and very bluesy. The Beatles on the other hand had no real formula for songs. Some songs, the most commonly know ones, are very poppy and I don't personally like them much. But others were very abstract, some were bluesy etc. I mean have you even heard The White Album?Now I'm not a huge fan of either band, but you don't have to make arrogant and uneducated comments like that.FYI, my opinion on music is better than everyone else's. And you good sir, don't have to say stupid things in order to try and provoke me into an arguement.
FYI, my opinion on music is better than everyone else's. And you good sir, don't have to say stupid things in order to try and provoke me into an arguement.
