Author Topic: Wouldn't an exclusive release be bad?  (Read 1160 times)

Offline zombux

  • ChiDem Frontline
  • *****
  • Posts: 5194
  • Gender: Male
  • Nemesis
    • http://www.zombux.net
Re: Wouldn't an exclusive release be bad?
« Reply #28 on: August 20, 2008, 05:35:20 PM »
that is still a lot though. the illusion albums cost $2m according to Matt Sorum...and thats 2 albums.

the value of USD dropped about 2,5 times since 1991 and circumstances changed massively

Offline awhellzno

  • Stinson Suit
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Wouldn't an exclusive release be bad?
« Reply #29 on: August 20, 2008, 06:42:29 PM »
I couldn't see Axl releasing anything in an edited-only format

Offline Pera

  • ChiDem Rocker
  • **
  • Posts: 830
  • http://i38.tinypic.com/1zohzth.jpg
    • [IMG]http://i147.photobucket.com/albums/r296/bumblefoot_01/Bucket.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Wouldn't an exclusive release be bad?
« Reply #30 on: August 20, 2008, 06:45:58 PM »

These are two examples of why fan forums are bad. Most people could give a rats ass about Axl and Chinese Democracy. Most who do, wouldn't want the pictures etc you'd get from an album. But the "hardcore" fans(the ones Axl hates most) will buy anything and everything.

I said the edition. the cd not itunes. I wont buya photo. Im not hardcore if he doesnt want to launch the album I wont suicide

 



Facebook Comments


GNR Audio N' Video
GNR Tracker
   
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal