www.gunsnroses.us - www.gunsnroses.us/tracker Guns N' Roses Torrents - Audio N' Video Community @ The Tracker
The Dirt: The Motley Crue StoryAnd I am currently reading some Aristotle and Pluto, I am deep into that kind of stuff
jajajajahey man,put your pencil in your ass,,that will be good for you,you really need this.
right now I'm studying the KORAN.
He means Pluto,the (ex) planet.Duh.
james may is a godlike specimen of a man
Or possibly Plato, founder of one of the first ever organized schools. Which Aristotle attended. Socrates, Aristotle and Plato and probably the most important thinkers in the Western World.
Nonsense, Hegel, Marx, Adam Smith and Darwin are probably the most important thinkers in the Western World. If you want to go back that far though I'd give a shout to Thales as possibly more innovative than the 3 of them.The main thrust of what i was trying to say though was I prefer it when people at least get the names right if they want to pretend they're 'deeply interested' in one of my own areas of interest.
I'll grant you Aristotle but in terms of philosophical value there's not too much to be found in Plato aside from some of the influence he had on Aristotle and the classic Socratic/Platonic criticism of democracy.However it has to be said that Plato did have a big influence with his theory of forms in terms of providing a debate between the medieval nominalists and realist and then further on influenced Russell since he later called the forms "universals". Oh how philosophers with strong desires are willing to invent such fictions!In terms of philosophical development Descartes is undoubtedly the most influential philosopher of the modern period since without him there would be no spurious debate between the British Empiricists and Continental Rationalism, no subject matter of psychology and most likely there wouldn't have been such a change to individualistic political philosophy, no concept of a mind as a private mental space containing privately owned objects, no introduction of consciousness as an epistemological self to mental object relation, no division between objectivity and subjectivity, no minds and no Wittgenstein to destroy the whole charade.